Review of Government Services Provision - 2024

This report, created by the Productivity Commission for the Steering Committee on Government Service Provision, offers an overview of justice services in Australia, with a focus on police, courts, and corrective services. It examines expenditures on these services, outlines the typical pathways through the criminal and civil justice systems, and key performance indicators for each sector, including re-offending rates, response times, and police complaints, as well as court backlogs and prisoner employment rates. The goal of the report is to provide insights into the equity, effectiveness, and efficiency of justice services across Australian states and territories.

​

RoGS compiles data from various sources, including state and territory governments, as well as Australian government courts and departments. Unlike other data collections that may involve organizations like the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare or the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the Courts section of RoGS does not have an intermediary data collector or validator. Instead, the data is sourced directly from Australian, state, and territory court authorities and departments.

 

RoGS encompasses a wide range of topics, such as:

• - Government spending on justice services.

• - Re-offending rates.

• - Police staffing levels.

• - Crime victimization statistics.

• - Public perceptions of safety.

• - Road fatalities.

• - Court lodgments and finalizations.

• - Court backlogs.

• - Processing times for court cases.

• - Court costs.

• - Populations of prisoners and offenders.

• - Employment rates for prisoners.

• - Assaults occurring in custody.

• - Costs associated with corrective services.

• - Completion rates for community corrections orders.

• - Escape rates from custody.

​

RoGS presents this data in various formats, including tables, charts, and graphs. The information is utilized to evaluate the performance of government services and to pinpoint areas needing improvement. RoGS is continuously enhanced by identifying new data sources to address reporting gaps, improving data comparability, and developing new performance indicators.

The sources highlight the necessity of cautious data interpretation due to differences in data collection methods and reporting requirements across jurisdictions. For instance, court backlogs may be influenced by factors unrelated to court delays, and a high breach rate for community corrections orders could indicate effective offender management rather than a negative outcome.